Role of the background regimes towards the Solar Mean Magnetic Field

Souvik Bose, K Nagaraju

The Solar Mean Magnetic Field (SMMF) is generally defined as disc-averaged line-of-sight (LOS) magnetic field on the sun. The role of active regions and the large-scale magnetic field structures (also called the background) has been debated over past few decades to understand whether the origin of SMMF is either due to the active regions or the background. In this paper, we have investigated the contribution of sunspots, plages, network regions and the background towards the SMMF using data from the SDO-AIA \& HMI, and found that 83\% of the SMMF is due to the background whereas the remaining 17\% originates from the active and network regions.

Original Article:

Critical magnetic field strengths for solar coronal plumes in quiet regions and coronal holes?

Ellis A. Avallone, Sanjiv K. Tiwari, Navdeep K. Tiwari, Ronald L. Moore, Amy Winebarger

Coronal plumes are bright magnetic funnels found in quiet regions (QRs) and coronal holes (CHs). They extend high into the solar corona and last from hours to days. The heating processes of plumes involve dynamics of the magnetic field at their base, but the processes themselves remain mysterious. Recent observations suggest that plume heating is a consequence of magnetic flux cancellation and/or convergence at the plume base. These studies suggest that the base flux in plumes is of mixed polarity, either obvious or hidden in SDO HMI data, but do not quantify it. To investigate the magnetic origins of plume heating, we select ten unipolar network flux concentrations, four in CHs, four in QRs, and two that do not form a plume, and track plume luminosity in SDO AIA 171 A images along with the base flux in SDO HMI magnetograms, over each flux concentrations lifetime. We find that plume heating is triggered when convergence of the base flux surpasses a field strength of 200 to 600 G. The luminosity of both QR and CH plumes respond similarly to the field in the plume base, suggesting that the two have a common formation mechanism. Our examples of non-plume-forming flux concentrations, reaching field strengths of 200 G for a similar number of pixels as for a couple of our plumes, suggest that a critical field might be necessary to form a plume but is not sufficient for it, thus, advocating for other mechanisms, e.g. flux cancellation due to hidden opposite-polarity field, at play.

Original Article:

Geometric and magnetic properties of coronal flux ropes associated with CMEs leading to geomagnetic storms

Ranadeep Sarkar, Nandita Srivastava

We have studied three Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (ICMEs) having clear signatures of magnetic cloud (MC) arrival at 1 AU and their associated solar sources during 2011 to 2013. Comparing the axial magnetic field strength (B0) of the near-Sun coronal flux-ropes with that of the MC at 1 AU, we have found that the average inferred value of B0 at 1 AU assuming the self-similar expansion of the flux-rope is two times smaller than the value of B0 obtained from the results of MC fitting. Furthermore, by comparing the initial orientation of the flux-rope near the Sun and its final orientation at 1 AU we have found that the three CMEs exhibited more than 80-degree rotation during its propagation through the interplanetary medium. Our study suggests that although the near-Sun magnetic properties of coronal flux-ropes can be used to infer the field strength of the associated MC at 1 AU, it is difficult to estimate the final orientation of the MC axis in order to predict the geo-effectiveness of the ICMEs.

Original Article:

Kinetic Properties of an Interplanetary Shock Propagating inside a Coronal Mass Ejection

Mingzhe Liu, Ying D. Liu, Zhongwei Yang, L. B. Wilson III, Huidong Hu

We investigate the kinetic properties of a typical fast-mode shock inside an interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) observed on 1998 August 6 at 1 AU, including particle distributions and wave analysis with the in situ measurements from Wind. Key results are obtained concerning the shock and the shock-ICME interaction at kinetic scales: (1) gyrating ions, which may provide energy dissipation at the shock in addition to wave-particle interactions, are observed around the shock ramp; (2) despite the enhanced proton temperature anisotropy of the shocked plasma, the low plasma beta inside the ICME constrains the shocked plasma under the thresholds of the ion cyclotron and mirror-mode instabilities; (3) whistler heat flux instabilities, which can pitch–angle scatter halo electrons through a cyclotron resonance, are observed around the shock, and can explain the disappearance of bidirectional electrons inside the ICME together with normal betatron acceleration; (4) whistler waves near the shock are likely associated with the whistler heat flux instabilities excited at the shock ramp, which is consistent with the result that the waves may originate from the shock ramp; (5) the whistlers share a similar characteristic with the shocklet whistlers observed by Wilson et al, providing possible evidence that the shock is decaying because of the strong magnetic field inside the ICME.

Original Article:

Initial features of an X-class flare observed with SUMER and TRACE

T. J. Wang, S. K. Solanki, D. E. Innes, W. Curdt

A class X1.5 flare started on the solar limb at 00:43 UT on 21 April 2002, which was associated with a CME observed at 01:27 UT by LASCO C2. The coordinated analyses of this flare include TRACE 195 {\AA} images and SUMER spectra in lines of Fe XXI, Fe XII, and C II. We find that: 1) The flare began with a jet seen by TRACE, which was detected by SUMER in the C II line as a strong brightening with blue shifts up to 170 km s$^{-1}$. At that time only weak emission was detected in Fe XII and Fe XXI. 2) Subsequently, a weak looplike brightening started south of the jet, moving outwards with an average speed of about 150 km s$^{-1}$. The SUMER spectra responded this moving loop as separatingly brightenings, visible only in the Fe XXI line. The southwards moving component contains red- and blue-shifted emission features and has an apparent speed of $\sim$120 km s$^{-1}$. The absence of signatures in Fe XII and C II lines indicates that the moving weak loop seen by TRACE corresponds to the emission from very hot plasma, in a blend line in the 195 {\AA} bandpass due to Fe XXIV formed at T > 10 MK. 3) The trigger mechanism of the flare and associated CME can be interpreted in the same way as that proposed by Wang et al. (2002) for an event with similar initial features.

Original Article:

Identifying typical Mg II flare spectra using machine learning

B. Panos, L. Kleint, C. Huwyler, S. Krucker, M. Melchior, D. Ullmann, S. Voloshynovskiy

IRIS performs solar observations over a large range of atmospheric heights, including the chromosphere where the majority of flare energy is dissipated. The strong Mg II h&k spectral lines are capable of providing excellent atmospheric diagnostics, but have not been fully utilized for flaring atmospheres. We aim to investigate whether the physics of the chromosphere is identical for all flare observations by analyzing if there are certain spectra that occur in all flares. To achieve this, we automatically analyze hundreds of thousands of Mg II h&k line profiles from a set of 33 flares, and use a machine learning technique which we call supervised hierarchical k-means, to cluster all profile shapes. We identify a single peaked Mg II profile, in contrast to the double-peaked quiet Sun profiles, appearing in every flare. Additionally, we find extremely broad profiles with characteristic blue shifted central reversals appearing at the front of fast-moving flare ribbons. These profiles occur during the impulsive phase of the flare, and we present results of their temporal and spatial correlation with non-thermal hard X-ray signatures, suggesting that flare-accelerated electrons play an important role in the formation of these profiles. The ratio of the integrated Mg II h&k lines can also serve as an opacity diagnostic, and we find higher opacities during each flare maximum. Our study shows that machine learning is a powerful tool for large scale statistical solar analyses.

Original Article:

Statistical Study of Chromospheric Evaporation in Impulsive Phase of Solar Flares

Viacheslav M Sadykov, Alexander G Kosovichev, Ivan N Sharykin, Graham S Kerr

We present a statistical study of chromospheric evaporation in solar flares using simultaneous observations by the RHESSI X-ray telescope and the IRIS UV spectrograph. The results are compared with radiation hydrodynamic flare models from the F-CHROMA RADYN database. For each event, we study spatially-resolved Doppler shifts of spectral lines formed in the transition region (C II 1334.5 A) and hot coronal plasma (Fe XXI 1354.1 A) to investigate the dynamics of the solar atmosphere during the flare impulsive phase. We estimate the energy fluxes deposited by high-energy electrons using X-ray imaging spectroscopy and assuming the standard thick-target model. Using the RADYN flare models, the RH 1.5D radiative transfer code and the Chianti atomic line database, we calculate C II and Fe XXI line profiles and compare with the observations. While the models predict a correlation between the Doppler shifts and deposited energy flux for both lines, this was only observed in the C II data, and not in the Fe XXI data. In addition, the C II and Fe XXI Doppler shifts are not correlated with each other in the observations and strongly correlated in models. Several quantitative discrepancies are found between the observations and models: the Fe XXI Doppler shifts are substantially stronger in the models than in the data, the C II mean blueshifts are absent in the observations but predicted by the models. The transition energy between "gentle" and "explosive" evaporation regimes derived from the observations ($2-8 \times{} 10^{9}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$) and the models ($2.2-8.3 \times{} 10^{9}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$) are comparable with each other. The results illustrate, for the first time, observational relationships among the processes of chromospheric evaporation, response of the colder layers, and the flare energy flux deposited by high-energy electrons.

Original Article: