Combining multiple structural inversions to constrain the Solar modelling problem

G. Buldgen, S. J. A. J. Salmon, A. Noels, R. Scuflaire, J. Montalban, V.A. Baturin, P. Eggenberger, V.K. Gryaznov, I.L. Iosilevskiy, G. Meynet, W. J. Chaplin, A. Miglio, A.V. Oreshina, O. Richard, A.N. Starostin

The Sun is the most studied of all stars. It is a reference for all other observed stars and a laboratory of fundamental physics helping us understand processes occuring in conditions irreproducible on Earth. However, our understanding of the Sun is currently stained by the solar modelling problem which can stem from various causes, such as the opacities, the equation of state and the mixing of chemical elements. We combine inversions of sound speed, an entropy proxy and the Ledoux discriminant with constraints such as the position of the base of the convective zone and the photospheric helium abundance. We test various combinations of standard ingredients for solar modelling such as abundance tables, equation of state, formalism for convection and diffusion and opacity tables and study the diagnostic potential of the inversions to constrain ad-hoc modifications of the opacity profile and additional mixing below the convective envelope. Combining inversions provides stringent constraints on the modifications on the models, far beyond what is achievable only from sound speed inversions. We constrain the form and amplitude of the opacity increase required and show that a 15% increase at log T=6.35 provides a significant improvement but that a more global increase of the opacity, within the uncertainties of current tables, coupled with an additional mixing at the bottom of the convective zone gives the best agreement for low metallicity models. We show that high metallicity models do not satisfy all the inversion results. We conclude that the solar problem likely occurs from various small sources, as ingredients such as the equation of state or the formalism of convection can induce small but significant changes and that using phase shift analyses combined with our approach is the next step for a better understanding of the inaccuracies of solar models just below the convective envelope.

Original Article: